Refuting arguments and then correcting them

September 3rd, 2008 | by Brian |

Steven at Black Belt Bayesian writes:

If you’re interested in being on the right side of disputes, you will refute your opponents’ arguments.  But if you’re interested in producing truth, you will fix your opponents’ arguments for them.  To win, you must fight not only the creature you encounter; you must fight the most horrible thing that can be constructed from its corpse.

A very good insight.  I should get to the Paul Graham essay he refers to.

(via OvercomingBias)

Share
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • TwitThis
tags:
You might also like:

Post a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation