wakalix

Insurance company wrong-doing no rationale for government health plan

The Denver Post published my letter to the editor on October 31.  (Yes, I just saw it now.)

Re: “The cost of failure on health care for Colorado,” Oct. 28 online-only guest commentary.

Say your neighborhood deli rigged its scales so that customers who paid for a pound of meat left the store with less. Does such fraud justify a government-run “public option” for delicatessens? Surely not, but this is how Colorado AFL-CIO Director Mike Cerbo argues for a new government-run insurance plan. Cerbo says it should “impermissible” for insurers to “drop coverage due to pre-existing medical conditions” — presumably when patients had been honest about medical histories. This is called “post-claim underwriting,” and it violates the insurer’s contract with the policy-holder. But this is no justification of a “public option.” Rather, if it happens frequently and without penalty, it shows that government has been lax in one of its legitimate duties: enforcing contracts.

• The “public plan” will be the only plan
• HB3962, insurance, and preexisting conditions
• More poison, not an antidote: Mandating employer health insurance
• The big lie behind politician-controlled medicine
• A health care “system” is the problem